KRS, Kebab Removal Service

los-angeles-county-limousine liked this

twentybrokenipodclassics liked this

braveheart1234321 liked this

buffafro liked this

just-a-recipe-for-disaster liked this

dragoninjesus liked this

seabed-shims liked this

fictitious-country-a-week said: What I think is there should be a minimum of 8 people and 5 adults. (if it goes below the people limit it adds a baby, and if it goes below the adults limit it adds an adult.) Either that or disable death entirely except for old age.

patrick514 liked this

hinochi-darenimo answered: While I would like more content, I think it’d be better to go back to the drawing board for now. Though I guess it also comes down to the question of would you rather revamp now while the content is minimal, or do it when there’s more to actually do?

book--wyrm answered: I quite like the idea of an idle/active hybrid

zoekmc answered: A redesign of the gameplay to make it more idle friendy would be nice and would make the randomness not a problem but a fun surprise when you tab back in to see whats you got. complexity isnt problem as its fun trying to figure the game out also.

deathstroke50 answered: I agree that it’s not a very idle idle game, but it is very fun still. It does overload a bit and could certainly be a bit more streamlined though.

awesomdom answered: I love you orteil keep doing the great job you do bby

stay-calm-its-only-4fffe4 answered: It was definitely annoying to work out, so a redesign might be in order. The game also just kinda looks complicated right now, which turns some people off, but I think that you can’t change that without removing a lot of the fun. Good luck!

n3gativezero liked this

occultek reblogged this from orteil42 and added:

I spent a few hours playing and beating this yesterday. I sent the game to a friend, and they played it for a while as...

th4nkyoub3n answered: redesign cookie clicker instead

graysongdl answered: One thing’s for certain: I am gonna SCREMM if you replace the current one without moving it somewhere for people to play as a “historical version” or somesuch, like the Cookie Clicker dungeons thing people can still play.

csl15-blog1 answered: Where are the zebras, you fucking hack? WHERE ARE MY ZEBRAS. Z E B R A C O O K I E

sonjatornquist answered: i think the way it is right now is great, just a little short. However it did take me

imfluid liked this

enceledan-blog liked this

toadgrower liked this

halfmorocco answered: I enjoy the current system, but not as an idle game. My suggestion is to embrace what you have, but rebrand it as a strategy/idle hybrid as opposed to a traditional idle game.

interestingmistakes answered: Go check out Explore Expand Exploit on /r/incremental_games and get some inspiration for a redesign!

dreamdeckup-blog answered: The current game is not so confusing once you get the hang of it it’s fine. Although, i agree completely on the fact that you should be making it more idle, because everything went to apeshit when i let it got for like 1 hour

ian22042 liked this

alamantus liked this

yourfirstnamealoud answered: k

breakingralter liked this

monkeysky liked this

tha-kaptain answered: Yeah, when I played it it was a bit of an information overload and I still largely couldn’t make sense of a lot of the mechanics. I dunno if it’s because I’m simple or ot

soulerflaire answered: I agree that it’s a bit too active for an idle game. Everything worked pretty well for me, but the core gameplay might need tweaking.

soulerflaire liked this

somethingfeline answered: i think either could work, but am more curious about the recode/revamp

somethingfeline liked this

misaimed-archer answered: Semiworks on kindle, never loads on windows.):

shut-up-murdoc liked this

boopinsnoop answered: I feel like having an idle game that is very involved makes it more rewarding, but I understand that the mechanisms are confusing, so simplification may be for the best

foxandcatadventures answered: I have to agree that the mechanics of the game in its current state are more complicated than they need to be. I think you could revamp it to make it less confusing but add depth in making things connected in different ways than now.

neilmakesgames liked this

fictitious-country-a-week answered: redo the entire game again

thatjupaparadox answered: It’s been a while since i played it, but i really enjoyed it, even if it was complex. It felt very rewarding learning and planning things out. I think it just needs to be expanded, but, a little polish can’t hurt.

arp1033 answered: I say keep going, dealing with what ya got is part of the fun!

kearunning answered: The game is fine as it is, just needs more features. I found the start of the game to be much more challenging (wrt Happiness and Health), mostly due to low population I think. Maybe more health options in early game?

orteil42 posted this

Show more notes

See, that’s what the app is perfect for.